The 10 best Alternatives to Fairly Made in 2026
Explore the 10 best Fairly Made alternatives and find the most complete ESG solution for your company in 2026.
These are the 10 Best Alternatives to Fairly Made in 2026
4 Key Factors When Choosing an Alternative to Fairly Made
5 Benefits of Exploring Alternatives to Fairly Made
3 Common Challenges When Changing from Fairly Made to Another Platform
Recommendations Before Choosing an Alternative to Fairly Made
Why Dcycle is the Best Alternative to Fairly Made
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Fairly Made is a supply chain traceability platform used primarily in fashion, apparel, and textiles — but it’s not the only option, and for many companies it’s not the right fit. Pricing, geographic coverage, methodology depth, and the ability to connect traceability data to broader ESG reporting obligations like CSRD are all reasons companies look for alternatives.
This guide evaluates the 10 best alternatives to Fairly Made in 2026, with focus on supplier traceability methodology, connection to carbon footprint and LCA outputs, CSRD supply chain disclosure requirements, and the evidence architecture that makes supply chain data defensible rather than just claimed.
Many supply chain platforms generate supplier scorecards and audit reports that live in a separate system from your CSRD Scope 3 calculations, LCA studies, and ESRS S2 disclosures. If your traceability data doesn’t flow into your sustainability reporting platform, you’re duplicating effort and creating reconciliation risk.
Key test: ask any platform how supplier-level emissions data flows from traceability into your Scope 3 category 1 (purchased goods) calculation — if the answer is a manual export, the platforms aren’t integrated.
When we compare different alternatives to Fairly Made, it's not enough to look at the platform's appearance or price. The important thing is to understand what our company really needs to manage ESG data effectively, traceably, and adapted to business objectives.
Below, we review the four essential factors we must consider before choosing any solution.
The first point is to define what frameworks or regulations we want to comply with. Not all platforms offer the same coverage or the same level of updating regarding regulations being implemented in Europe.
We must ensure the tool can adapt to main reference frameworks, such as EINF, CSRD, SBTI objectives, European Taxonomy, or ISO certifications, guaranteeing a solid compliance approach that allows the company to comply with regulations without duplicating efforts.
Each company may be subject to different requirements, so having a solution capable of distributing ESG data to different formats and reports is fundamental to avoid duplicating efforts.
Furthermore, choosing a flexible platform allows us to anticipate regulatory changes, avoiding having to replace the system or resort to external consultancies each time a new legal requirement or reporting standard appears.
Understanding how ESG reporting connects with sustainable finance frameworks helps companies align their data management with investor expectations and prepare for evolving disclosure requirements.
ESG management doesn't depend on a single person. It involves different areas and teams: finance, operations, purchasing, human resources, or sustainability.
That's why, it's key to analyse how many users will work with the tool and what level of access or control each one needs.
A good ESG solution must allow defining roles, permissions, and workflows, guaranteeing each user can collaborate without compromising data integrity. When information flows orderly, errors are reduced and efficiency is gained.
It's also important that the platform is intuitive and accessible for all profiles. We can't depend on a technical department for each update.
The key is for any team member to be able to access, interpret, and update ESG information without friction.
In practice, ESG management success depends on how much we can automate repetitive processes.
If we continue depending on spreadsheets or manual updates, error risk increases and information loses value over time.
That's why, we must seek solutions that automate data collection from original sources and transform them into coherent and traceable metrics. This includes energy, operational, logistics, or financial data, among others.
A solid platform must offer data histories, automatic validations, and complete traceability, so that any figure is supported by its origin and context.
That traceability not only provides reliability, but facilitates audits, verifications, or regulatory reviews without additional effort.
The fourth key factor is in technological integrations.
In most companies, relevant information for ESG reports already exists within systems such as ERP, CRM, invoicing tools, or internal databases.
A good alternative to Fairly Made must be able to connect directly with those sources, avoiding duplications or manual information loads.
The more fluid the connection between systems, the faster and more precise ESG report generation will be.
Furthermore, integration not only improves operational efficiency, but allows maintaining a single work environment, in which data updates automatically and stays aligned with business reality.
In short, choosing an alternative to Fairly Made is not a technical decision, but a strategic one.
We must commit to a solution that unifies ESG data, automates processes, and allows adapting to any use case, guaranteeing sustainability functions as a real tool of competitiveness and growth.
More and more companies are reviewing their ESG tools to seek more complete, efficient solutions aligned with their real needs.
Analysing different alternatives to Fairly Made doesn't mean starting from scratch, but finding a more effective way to manage, automate, and leverage ESG data as a strategic asset.
Furthermore, for organisations that trade on the stock exchange, having advanced ESG management tools not only facilitates regulatory compliance, but reinforces transparency before investors and improves market trust in their sustainable performance.
One of the most evident benefits is resource optimisation.
By having a platform that automates ESG data collection, structuring, and distribution, we directly reduce time and effort dedicated to manual tasks.
Furthermore, we eliminate dependencies on external consultancies or isolated tools, which decreases recurring costs and allows us to allocate those resources to higher-value areas. In short, when we centralise ESG information in a single solution, we improve operational efficiency and reduce unnecessary expenses.
Each company has a different level of maturity in its ESG strategy. That's why, a solid alternative must offer flexibility to adapt to different development phases and organisation size.
Having a scalable tool allows us to start with the essentials (for example, measuring Carbon Footprint or consolidating social data) and then expand towards other frameworks or certifications as business needs evolve.
Thus, we guarantee the investment remains useful long-term.
In our case, we work with that logic: a living solution, capable of growing with the company and covering any ESG use case it needs to address.
Time is a strategic resource.
That's why, one of the greatest advantages of changing to a more advanced solution is the capacity to generate ESG reports automatically and in a few minutes.
By having all data centralised and traceable, we can generate reports for EINF, CSRD, SBTI, Taxonomy, or ISOs without duplicating efforts or depending on spreadsheets.
This not only accelerates teams' work, but increases reliability and consistency of information presented to auditors, regulators, or investors.
The result: less administrative burden, more agility, and more control over data.
Today, no company functions with a single system. That's why, it's fundamental that the ESG tool integrates easily with existing ERPs, CRMs, or internal platforms.
A good alternative must guarantee total interoperability, allowing data to flow without interruptions between the business's different areas.
This avoids duplications, improves traceability, and facilitates connection between sustainability, finance, and operations.
Furthermore, by working with a cloud infrastructure, implementation is quick, secure, and without needing complex technical developments.
Thus we achieve sustainability being managed from the same logic as the rest of the business's key processes.
Another aspect to consider is clarity in pricing structure. Many ESG platforms work with closed models or unpredictable rates, which makes estimating real long-term cost of use difficult.
Opting for an alternative with flexible and transparent pricing models allows adjusting the service to each company's size and needs.
This helps maintain clearer economic control, without hidden costs or surprises in billing.
In summary, exploring new ESG solutions is not just a matter of tools: it's an opportunity to reduce costs, gain agility, improve report precision, and increase competitiveness in an environment where non-financial data is increasingly determinant.
Changing ESG platforms can generate doubts or certain resistance, but understanding common challenges allows us to plan a smoother transition without friction.
One of the first challenges is migrating historical information.
When data is dispersed in different systems or formats, it may be necessary to review, standardise, and validate them before incorporating them into the new tool.
With a well-structured platform, this process is simplified, as data can be imported automatically from spreadsheets, internal systems, or external sources without losing traceability.
The important thing is to maintain data consistency from day one.
Technology only works if people use it correctly. That's why, another common challenge is adoption by internal teams.
If the tool is complex or not very intuitive, the process can drag on and generate frustration.
The key is choosing an intuitive, clear, and easy-to-use platform, which doesn't require advanced technical training.
Thus, any user—whether from the financial, operations, or sustainability area—can collaborate effectively and securely in ESG management.
The third challenge has to do with coherence between the tool and the company's sustainability strategy.
Often, organisations adopt solutions that don't completely adjust to their needs, generating misalignments between data and real objectives.
That's why, it's fundamental that the new ESG platform is designed to adapt to different frameworks, regulations, and business priorities, and that it allows evolving without changing systems.
In our case, we're clear: we're not auditors or consultants, we're a solution for companies, and our role is to facilitate data working in service of strategy.
When transition is managed with planning and appropriate tools, benefits far outweigh challenges.
The company gains control, clarity, and capacity to convert ESG information into a real competitive advantage.
For Scope 3 category 1 (purchased goods and services), supplier-specific activity data is the gold standard. Evaluate whether the platform collects primary supplier data (energy consumption, material inputs, production volumes) that can feed into LCA or spend-based emission calculations, versus collecting only audit compliance data that doesn’t generate emission figures.
CSRD’s ESRS S2 requires disclosure on workers in the value chain — working conditions, human rights risks, due diligence processes. Verify that the platform supports the specific disclosure points ESRS S2 requires, not just generic supplier audit scores. CSDDD due diligence requirements add a legal layer beyond voluntary ESG disclosure.
Most supply chain risks (environmental and social) concentrate in Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers, not Tier 1. Evaluate the platform’s methodology for extending visibility beyond first-tier suppliers, and its geographic database coverage for the sourcing regions your supply chain actually uses.
Level 1: Tier 1 supplier list only, no environmental or social data collected, Scope 3 cat. 1 spend-based.
Level 2: supplier audits, primary emissions data from key suppliers, ESRS S2 disclosures in progress.
Level 3: Tier 2+ visibility, supplier data integrated into Scope 3 and LCA calculations, CSDDD due diligence documented.
When choosing among different alternatives to Fairly Made, what really marks the difference is not only functionality, but the capacity to offer a comprehensive, flexible solution oriented to the real value of ESG data.
In our case, we're not auditors or consultants, we're a solution designed for companies wanting to measure, manage, and communicate their ESG impact simply and efficiently.
Our objective is for each organisation to be able to collect all its ESG information and distribute it automatically to different use cases, without complications or manual processes.
We centralise environmental, social, and governance data from any source—ERP, CRM, spreadsheets, or internal systems—and convert them into standardised, traceable metrics ready for official reports.
Thus, companies can generate documentation compatible with EINF, CSRD, SBTI, European Taxonomy, ISOs, or any other standard, in a matter of minutes.
Furthermore, our platform is designed to automate and simplify ESG management to the maximum. Everything works in the cloud, without complex installations or needing technical developments.
In a few clicks, teams can visualise their performance, identify improvement areas, and prepare reports ready for audits or regulatory reviews.
We firmly believe that sustainability should be a strategic lever of competitiveness, not an administrative formality.
That's why, our mission is clear: convert ESG data into smarter, more efficient, and more profitable business decisions.
With Dcycle, companies can control their information, reduce costs, automate processes, and guarantee total traceability of their ESG indicators.
In a market where measuring well is the difference between moving forward or staying behind, our proposal is simple: make sustainability function as a real growth engine.
As companies work towards decarbonization goals and improved environmental sustainability performance, having robust ESG data management becomes essential for tracking progress and demonstrating commitment to stakeholders.
When seeking alternatives to Fairly Made, the first thing we must be clear about is what we need to resolve and what we expect to obtain from the change.
It's not about finding a similar tool, but identifying a solution that adapts to our company's reality and improves how we manage our ESG data.
We must prioritise three key aspects: automation, traceability, and adaptability. A good platform must collect data automatically, maintain complete traceability of each record, and allow adapting to different regulatory frameworks without needing complex configurations.
It's also convenient to ensure the solution is easy to implement, scalable, and compatible with our internal systems.
This will avoid additional costs and allow us to start working quickly, maintaining data reliability from the first moment.
Main advantages are in flexibility and functional coverage.
Whilst some tools focus on a specific sector or type of data, today there exist more complete solutions that cover all ESG aspects: environmental, social, and governance.
These alternatives allow centralising all information in the same environment, automating reports, reducing manual processes, and facilitating generation of documentation compatible with EINF, CSRD, SBTI, European Taxonomy, or ISOs.
Furthermore, many current platforms offer greater transparency in prices and implementation times, something that facilitates planning and project control from the start.
In short, the change is not only technological, but also strategic: we move from measuring by obligation to managing by value.
To objectively compare different ESG tools, the most recommendable is to define measurable criteria before starting.
This allows us to evaluate each solution based on our real needs, without being swayed by marketing or functionalities that don't add value to our business.
We can do this by evaluating four variables:
By comparing with these parameters, decision becomes more rational and aligned with business objectives. The important thing is not having "more data", but that data is useful, reliable, and easy to convert into action.
Before performing a migration, it's fundamental to organise and audit existing data. This implies reviewing what information we have, in what format, and what part of it remains relevant or should be updated.
The second step is to define who will be responsible for each type of data within the new platform: emissions, energy consumption, suppliers, governance, etc.
In this way, transition will be faster and without information losses.
We also recommend planning integrations with internal systems (such as ERP or CRM) and establishing a progressive adoption calendar. Thus we guarantee teams adapt naturally, maintaining day-to-day operability without interruptions.
In our case, we help companies migrate and structure their ESG data without complications, ensuring all information is traced and ready to be used from day one.
Because we're not auditors or consultants, we're a Solution for companies seeking to automate, centralise, and leverage their ESG data with a comprehensive vision.
Our objective is for each company to be able to manage its non-financial information efficiently, without depending on manual processes or multiple disconnected tools.
We collect all ESG data—environmental, social, and governance—and distribute them automatically in different use cases: EINF, SBTI, CSRD, Taxonomy, ISOs, or any other regulatory framework. All from a single platform, in the cloud, ready to use and without needing installation.
Furthermore, we facilitate teams to collaborate, share information, and generate reports in a matter of minutes.
Traceability is guaranteed and data reliability is total.
Our mission is clear: convert sustainability into a strategic lever for the company. We don't want ESG management to be a burden, but a tool that provides clarity, efficiency, and competitiveness.
If something defines our proposal, it's this: we make measuring, managing, and communicating ESG impact simpler, faster, and more profitable.
Carbon footprint calculation analyzes all emissions generated throughout a product’s life cycle, including raw material extraction, production, transportation, usage, and disposal.
The most recognized methodologies are:
Digital tools like Dcycle simplify the process, providing accurate and actionable insights.
Some strategies require initial investment, but long-term benefits outweigh costs.
Investing in carbon reduction is not just an environmental action, it’s a smart business strategy.
.png)
