The ESG platform that centralizes your data, simplifies any regulatory framework and gives you information you can trust.

The webinar is over, but here is everything that matters.

Download a sample Sustainable Mobility Plan

A real SMP template so you can see the structure, sections and level of detail the law requires before you draft your own.

Download sample SMP

Webinar recording

Could not attend live? Here is the full recording.

Want to build your plan with your own data? Talk to the team

Frequently asked questions

One plan per company or one per work center?
One per center. The SMP is measured and drafted per work center, not per company: each center with more than 200 people (or more than 100 per shift) needs its own plan adapted to its reality, even if the methodology and structure are shared across the organization. The law measures the threshold per work center, as defined in article 1.5 of the Workers' Statute.
I have 30 centers and only 2 exceed the threshold. What do I do?
The plan is only made for those two centers, not for the whole company. The obligation is measured per work center, so a company with several centers can have some obligated and others not.
Several group companies share one building. How does it count?
Responsibility lies with each employer company for its own workers: each company that exceeds the threshold at its center is obligated, and those that do not, are not. When several companies share a location, the law encourages coordination mechanisms to implement mobility solutions jointly. Exactly how it is computed when several companies coexist in one building is an interpretive point worth validating with legal advice.
Almost everyone works remotely and no center reaches 100. Am I obligated?
The threshold refers to people whose habitual work center is that center. If no center reaches 200 people (or 100 per shift) as their habitual place of work, there would be no legal obligation for an SMP, although doing it voluntarily is still advisable.
Do people assigned to a center but working remotely or off-site count?
The law ties the threshold to the center being the habitual place of work. Someone formally assigned but who mostly works remotely and rarely comes in generates little or no commuting to that center, and the purpose of the law (rationalizing real journeys) would support not counting them. The law does not set a numeric rule of on-site days, so this is an interpretive area.
A center that is only a warehouse, with workers operating off-site (cleaning, gardening). Does it count?
Same root as remote work: if their activity habitually takes place at third-party locations, it is very defensible that they do not generate commuting to the center in the strict sense. There is no express ruling, so it is an interpretive point.
I have 110 people on flexible hours. Does the 100-per-shift threshold apply?
The law is thinking of differentiated entry and exit shifts. Flexible hours with an entry and exit window are not technically a shift system but a single group with flexibility. On that basis, it would be assessed against the general threshold of 200, not the 100-per-shift one. It is an interpretive point.
Do temp-agency staff, contractors and subcontractors count toward the threshold?
Law 9/2025 contains no explicit rule for counting temp-agency or contractor staff toward the 200/100 threshold: it only mentions people whose habitual center is that center. This contrasts with other rules (such as equality plans, RD 901/2020) where the headcount is detailed. For the diagnosis in practice, those who access the center steadily do generate real commuting and it is reasonable to include them in the analysis, even if their count toward the threshold is a matter to assess legally.
Is there an official mandatory plan structure or template?
The law does not set a fixed structure. Article 26.3 lists the families of measures the plan must contemplate under the hierarchy principle of article 28 (active mobility, public transport, low or zero emissions, shared mobility, remote work where possible, and road safety), but it does not impose a single index. Good practice and the IDAE methodology recommend: a descriptive report of the center, a quantitative diagnosis (survey), measurable objectives, prioritized measures, a timeline and a monitoring system.
Do I have to negotiate it with the unions, or is trying enough?
The law requires negotiating, not necessarily reaching an agreement. Article 26.2 requires negotiating the plan with the workers' legal representatives; if there are none, a negotiating committee is set up with the most representative sector unions. The company can approve the plan documenting the negotiation process, although a signed plan is far more solid before an inspection.
Who designs the survey? Is there an official model?
The company or its consultant designs it. There is no mandatory official form, but the IDAE offers a reference methodology. At a minimum, it is worth capturing the transport mode, the shift, the reason for the transport choice and the perceived risks on the journey: these are the core of the article 26 diagnosis.
Is there a 40% minimum survey response rate?
No. Law 9/2025 sets no 40% response threshold, nor any other percentage. The law asks for a diagnosis based on reliable data, and good practice speaks of a representative response rate, not a fixed figure. Since no one can be forced to respond, you work with a representative sample and estimates.
Do I have to update the data every year?
Not necessarily. The law requires a monitoring report every two years, and the plan must be updated at least every five years, or sooner if the conditions of the center or workforce change significantly.
How does GDPR affect mobility surveys?
The law does not exempt you from GDPR. The usual approach: an appropriate legal basis (legitimate interest or compliance with a legal obligation), prior information, data minimization (asking only for what is needed, such as the approximate origin by area rather than the exact address) and, where possible, anonymized or aggregated processing. Sending the survey to contractor or temp-agency staff adds complexity around who is the data controller and who the processor.
Does the December 5 deadline include the negotiation?
Yes. It is the deadline to have the plan drafted, negotiated and implemented. Royal Decree-law 7/2026, of March 20, cut the period from 24 to 12 months and set the deadline at December 5, 2026. Since the full process usually takes 6 to 9 months, the margin is tight.
Is it annual, like the EINF carbon footprint?
No. The SMP has biennial monitoring and a five-year update cycle, independent of the annual carbon footprint reporting cycle.
What if I am not required to calculate Scope 3?
They are independent obligations. The carbon footprint derives from another rule (Law 7/2021 and RD 214/2025) and applies to companies with more than 500 employees or that meet two of three size criteria. Even if you are not required to report a footprint, you still have to do the SMP diagnosis. The upside: the mobility survey that feeds Scope 3 category 7 of the GHG Protocol captures much of the data the SMP requires, so those who already calculate it reuse the work.
What penalties are there for not having the plan?
Not having the plan on time (when it harms the mobility system) and not producing the monitoring reports are minor infringements, from 101 to 2,000 euros, which lapse after 6 months; the sanctioning body is the State Secretariat for Transport and Sustainable Mobility. Three minor infringements in a year can escalate to serious, and if you received aid under RDL 7/2026 and fail to comply, the full aid must be repaid.
How does it affect public tenders?
The seventh final provision amends the Public Sector Contracts Law to prepare the plan as a condition of access to tenders and subsidies. Without an SMP you can be excluded from certain tenders and grants. On the positive side, there are competitive subsidy calls where the score depends on the quality of the plan, plus the reputational and ESG upside.
Does my region have its own regulation (for example Andalusia)?
Article 26.9 establishes that the national SMP regulation applies on a supplementary basis to whatever the competent mobility authority or each municipality's urban planning provides. If a region has its own regulation, it prevails; if not, the national one applies. Some regions (Madrid, Navarre, the Basque Country) have already started with their own guides or aid.

Executive summary

What Spain's Sustainable Mobility Law requires and how to reach December 5

Juanjo Mestre (CEO and cofounder at Dcycle) and Ana Mateu (Customer Success and Sustainable Mobility Plan specialist) walked through Law 9/2025, published in Spain's official gazette on December 3, 2025: what it requires, who it applies to, and how to build a plan that passes audit, avoids penalties, and completes the scope 3 commuting footprint along the way. They told it through a practical case: a quality manager at a multi-site company who discovers the obligation mid-way through an ISO 14001 audit.

Who it applies to and what counts toward the threshold

The obligation to approve a Sustainable Mobility Plan (SMP) reaches work centers with more than 200 people, or more than 100 per shift. The threshold is measured per work center, not per company (under article 1.5 of the Workers' Statute), so a company can have some centers obligated and others not. The law does not set an explicit rule for counting temp-agency staff or subcontractors toward that threshold, but those who access the center steadily do generate real commuting and it is sensible to include them in the diagnosis. A multi-site company needs one plan per center, because the mobility options of an urban office and an isolated industrial park are not the same.

Two regulatory layers: national and regional

Beyond the national law, some regions already had their own rule: Catalonia (decree 132/2024, commuting plan since August 2025) and the Basque Country (law 4/2019, since 2022 for centers over 100 people per shift), with thresholds that differ from the national one. You must check both layers: the regional rule can bind you even if you do not reach the national threshold of 200, and the national law prevails and must also be reported.

What the plan must contain

The plan must capture how employees, visitors and suppliers commute, and propose measures following the hierarchy principle: first active mobility (walking, cycling), then public transport, low-emission vehicles, shared mobility and, last, the individual car. It also includes three often-overlooked points: remote work where possible, road-safety measures (commuting accidents are the leading cause of workplace accidents in Spain) and, for centers with more than 1,000 people in cities over 500,000 inhabitants, flexible hours to avoid rush hour.

The three mandatory phases

A valid SMP goes through three phases: diagnosis (understanding how people actually commute, via a mobility survey with a representative response rate), negotiation with union representatives (it cannot be approved unilaterally, like the equality plan) and registration in the EDIM (the integrated mobility data space), the public platform managed through each region. Because it is public, clients, investors and the works council will see it: the absence of a plan is as visible as the fine (100 to 2,000 euros for minor infringements), and the real risk is being flagged as non-compliant in a procurement process. The plan is reviewed every two years.

The deadline and why the effort is worth it

The deadline is December 5, 2026. The original law gave 24 months, but the royal decree in force cut it to 12, leaving only a few months (fewer once you subtract the summer). The key takeaway: the SMP diagnosis uses exactly the same data as scope 3 category 7 (employee commuting). If you build the plan on data that already serves your carbon footprint, the work stands on its own even if the rule changes. In the demo, Dcycle showed how to launch the mobility survey, see the diagnosis in dashboards that update themselves, and generate the per-center plan PDF with AI-assisted drafting connected to the platform data via MCP.

Dcycle reuses this same data for your carbon footprint. See it in a demo

Download the webinar presentation

All the session slides, with the data, examples and references we shared live.

Download presentation

Do you need to comply with Spain's Sustainable Mobility Law?

See how Dcycle helps you structure your Sustainable Mobility Plan, pass audit, and control your scope 3 commuting footprint.

Book a call